4.8 Article

APC/CCdh1 controls CtIP stability during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 33, Issue 23, Pages 2860-2879

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201489017

Keywords

Cdh1; cell cycle; CtIP; DNA damage; DNA double-strand break repair

Funding

  1. NWO-VIDI [016.136.334]
  2. Dutch Cancer Society [RUG-2011-5093]
  3. ERC [ERC-2011-293445]
  4. Vontobel-Stiftung
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_135507]
  6. Promedica Stiftung
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_135507] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms for responding to DNA damage to maintain genome stability and prevent carcinogenesis. For instance, the cell cycle can be arrested at different stages to allow time for DNA repair. The APC/C-Cdh1 ubiquitin ligase mainly regulates mitotic exit but is also implicated in the DNA damage-induced G(2) arrest. However, it is currently unknown whether APC/C-Cdh1 also contributes to DNA repair. Here, we show that Cdh1 depletion causes increased levels of genomic instability and enhanced sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Using an integrated proteomics and bioinformatics approach, we identify CtIP, a DNA-end resection factor, as a novel APC/C-Cdh1 target. CtIP interacts with Cdh1 through a conserved KEN box, mutation of which impedes ubiquitylation and downregulation of CtIP both during G(1) and after DNA damage in G(2). Finally, we find that abrogating the CtIP-Cdh1 interaction results in delayed CtIP clearance from DNA damage foci, increased DNA-end resection, and reduced homologous recombination efficiency. Combined, our results highlight the impact of APC/C-Cdh1 on the maintenance of genome integrity and show that this is, at least partially, achieved by controlling CtIP stability in a cell cycle- and DNA damage-dependent manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available