4.8 Article

Why do cellular proteins linked to K63-polyubiquitin chains not associate with proteasomes?

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 552-565

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.354

Keywords

lysine-63; lysine-48; polyubiquitin; proteasome; ubiquitin binding protein

Funding

  1. NIH [051923-11]
  2. ALS Foundation
  3. Packard Center for ALS Research
  4. Fidelity Biosciences Research Initiative
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. Clinician Scientist Fellowship
  7. Medical Research Council [G0802822] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0802822] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although cellular proteins conjugated to K48-linked Ub chains are targeted to proteasomes, proteins conjugated to K63-ubiquitin chains are directed to lysosomes. However, pure 26S proteasomes bind and degrade K48- and K63-ubiquitinated substrates similarly. Therefore, we investigated why K63-ubiquitinated proteins are not degraded by proteasomes. We show that mammalian cells contain soluble factors that selectively bind to K63 chains and inhibit or prevent their association with proteasomes. Using ubiquitinated proteins as affinity ligands, we found that the main cellular proteins that associate selectively with K63 chains and block their binding to proteasomes are ESCRT0 (Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport) and its components, STAM and Hrs. In vivo, knockdown of ESCRT0 confirmed that it is required to block binding of K63-ubiquitinated molecules to the proteasome. In addition, the Rad23 proteins, especially hHR23B, were found to bind specifically to K48-ubiquitinated proteins and to stimulate proteasome binding. The specificities of these proteins for K48- or K63-ubiquitin chains determine whether a ubiquitinated protein is targeted for proteasomal degradation or delivered instead to the endosomal-lysosomal pathway. The EMBO Journal (2013) 32, 552-565. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.354; Published online 11 January 2013

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available