4.8 Article

Endogenous DNA replication stress results in expansion of dNTP pools and a mutator phenotype

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 895-907

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.485

Keywords

deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates; DNA damage; DNA replication; mutagenesis; ribonucleotide reductase

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP79368]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. MEXT
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  5. Swedish Research Council
  6. Swedish Cancer Society
  7. National Institutes of Health [1R01HG005084-01A1, 1R01HG005853-01]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21681025] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The integrity of the genome depends on diverse pathways that regulate DNA metabolism. Defects in these pathways result in genome instability, a hallmark of cancer. Deletion of ELG1 in budding yeast, when combined with hypomorphic alleles of PCNA results in spontaneous DNA damage during S phase that elicits upregulation of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) activity. Increased RNR activity leads to a dramatic expansion of deoxyribonucleotide (dNTP) pools in G1 that allows cells to synthesize significant fractions of the genome in the presence of hydroxyurea in the subsequent S phase. Consistent with the recognized correlation between dNTP levels and spontaneous mutation, compromising ELG1 and PCNA results in a significant increase in mutation rates. Deletion of distinct genome stability genes RAD54, RAD55, and TSA1 also results in increased dNTP levels and mutagenesis, suggesting that this is a general phenomenon. Together, our data point to a vicious circle in which mutations in gatekeeper genes give rise to genomic instability during S phase, inducing expansion of the dNTP pool, which in turn results in high levels of spontaneous mutagenesis. The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 895-907. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.485; Published online 10 January 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available