4.8 Article

The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent '+4' cell markers

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 14, Pages 3079-3091

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.166

Keywords

Lgr5; proteomics; signature; stem cells; transcriptomics

Funding

  1. CBG
  2. Ti Pharma [T3-106]
  3. EU/Health [F4-2007-200720]
  4. ERC [232814]
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. NIH/NCI Physical Sciences Oncology Center at MIT [U54CA143874]
  7. Cancer Research UK [12481] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [232814] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of stem cells are currently defined in small intestinal crypts: cycling crypt base columnar (CBC) cells and quiescent '+4' cells. Here, we combine transcriptomics with proteomics to define a definitive molecular signature for Lgr5(+) CBC cells. Transcriptional profiling of FACS-sorted Lgr5(+) stem cells and their daughters using two microarray platforms revealed an mRNA stem cell signature of 384 unique genes. Quantitative mass spectrometry on the same cell populations identified 278 proteins enriched in intestinal stem cells. The mRNA and protein data sets showed a high level of correlation and a combined signature of 510 stem cell-enriched genes was defined. Spatial expression patterns were further characterized by mRNA in-situ hybridization, revealing that approximately half of the genes were expressed in a gradient with highest levels at the crypt bottom, while the other half was expressed uniquely in Lgr5(+) stem cells. Lineage tracing using a newly established knock-in mouse for one of the signature genes, Smoc2, confirmed its stem cell specificity. Using this resource, we find-and confirm by independent approaches-that the proposed quiescent/'+4' stem cell markers Bmi1, Tert, Hopx and Lrig1 are robustly expressed in CBC cells. The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 3079-3091. doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.166; Published online 12 June 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available