4.8 Article

Generation of DNA single-strand displacement by compromised nucleotide excision repair

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 31, Issue 17, Pages 3550-3563

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2012.193

Keywords

Exo1; nucleotide excision repair; XPD helicase; XPG endonuclease; gamma H2AX

Funding

  1. La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer
  2. Association for International Cancer Research [AICR: 07-0129]
  3. ATIP InCa/CNRS [039438]
  4. ANR blanc FRETNET
  5. foundation RITC
  6. Region Midi-Pyrenees (CPER)
  7. Grand Toulouse community
  8. ARC (ARC Equipement) [8505]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a precisely coordinated process essential to avoid DNA damage-induced cellular malfunction and mutagenesis. Here, we investigate the mechanistic details and effects of the NER machinery when it is compromised by a pathologically significant mutation in a subunit of the repair/transcription factor TFIIH, namely XPD. In contrast to previous studies, we find that no single- or double-strand DNA breaks are produced at early time points after UV irradiation of cells bearing a specific XPD mutation, despite the presence of a clear histone H2AX phosphorylation (cH2AX) signal in the UV-exposed areas. We show that the observed cH2AX signal can be explained by the presence of longer single-strand gaps possibly generated by strand displacement. Our in vivo measurements also indicate a strongly reduced TFIIH-XPG binding that could promote single-strand displacement at the site of UV lesions. This finding not only highlights the crucial role of XPG's interactions with TFIIH for proper NER, but also sheds new light on how a faulty DNA repair process can induce extreme genomic instability in human patients. The EMBO Journal (2012) 31, 3550-3563. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.193; Published online 3 August 2012 Subject Categories: genome stability & dynamics; molecular biology of disease

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available