4.8 Article

p38MAPK is a novel DNA damage response-independent regulator of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1536-1548

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.69

Keywords

aging; cancer; inflammation; NF-kappa B; tumour suppression

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG09909, AG017242, AG25901]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Larry L Hillblom Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular senescence suppresses cancer by forcing potentially oncogenic cells into a permanent cell cycle arrest. Senescent cells also secrete growth factors, proteases, and inflammatory cytokines, termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Much is known about pathways that regulate the senescence growth arrest, but far less is known about pathways that regulate the SASP. We previously showed that DNA damage response (DDR) signalling is essential, but not sufficient, for the SASP, which is restrained by p53. Here, we delineate another crucial SASP regulatory pathway and its relationship to the DDR and p53. We show that diverse senescence-inducing stimuli activate the stress-inducible kinase p38MAPK in normal human fibroblasts. p38MAPK inhibition markedly reduced the secretion of most SASP factors, constitutive p38MAPK activation was sufficient to induce an SASP, and p53 restrained p38MAPK activation. Further, p38MAPK regulated the SASP independently of the canonical DDR. Mechanistically, p38MAPK induced the SASP largely by increasing NF-kappa B transcriptional activity. These findings assign p38MAPK a novel role in SASP regulation-one that is necessary, sufficient, and independent of previously described pathways. The EMBO Journal (2011) 30, 1536-1548. doi:10.1038/emboj.2011.69; Published online 11 March 2011 Subject Categories: signal transduction; genome stability & dynamics

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available