4.8 Article

Asf1b, the necessary Asf1 isoform for proliferation, is predictive of outcome in breast cancer

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 480-493

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.335

Keywords

Asf1b; breast cancer; histones; proliferation

Funding

  1. la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisee Ligue)
  2. PIC Programs
  3. European Commission Network of Excellence Epigenome [LSHG-CT-2004-503433]
  4. European Commission ITN [FP7-PEOPLE-2007, FP7-PEOPLE-2008]
  5. ANR [ANR-09-BLAN-0257-01]
  6. INCa
  7. ERC [2009-AdG_20090506]
  8. University Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC)
  9. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mammalian cells possess two isoforms of the histone H3-H4 chaperone anti-silencing function 1 (Asf1), Asf1a and Asf1b. However to date, whether they have individual physiological roles has remained elusive. Here, we aim to elucidate the functional importance of Asf1 isoforms concerning both basic and applied aspects. First, we reveal a specific proliferation-dependent expression of human Asf1b unparalleled by Asf1a. Strikingly, in cultured cells, both mRNA and protein corresponding to Asf1b decrease upon cell cycle exit. Depletion of Asf1b severely compromises proliferation, leads to aberrant nuclear structures and a distinct transcriptional signature. Second, a major physiological implication is found in the applied context of tissue samples derived from early stage breast tumours in which we examined Asf1a/b levels. We reveal that overexpression of Asf1b mRNA correlate with clinical data and disease outcome. Together, our results highlight a distribution of tasks between the distinct Asf1 isoforms, which emphasizes a specialized function of Asf1b required for proliferation capacity. We discuss the implications of these results for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. The EMBO Journal (2011) 30, 480-493. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.335; Published online 21 December 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available