4.8 Article

Caspase-8 and caspase-7 sequentially mediate proteolytic activation of acid sphingomyelinase in TNF-R1 receptosomes

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 379-394

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.326

Keywords

acid sphingomyelinase; caspase-7; caspase-8; ceramide; TNF receptosomes

Funding

  1. Germany Research Foundation (DFG) Collaborative Research Center [SFB 415]
  2. DFG [SPP 1267]
  3. Schleswig-Holstein Cluster of Excellence 'Inflammation at Interfaces'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously demonstrated that tumour necrosis factor (TNF) -induced ceramide production by endosomal acid sphingomyelinase (A-SMase) couples to apoptosis signalling via activation of cathepsin D and cleavage of Bid, resulting in caspase-9 and caspase-3 activation. The mechanism of TNF-mediated A-SMase activation within the endolysosomal compartment is poorly defined. Here, we show that TNF-induced A-SMase activation depends on functional caspase-8 and caspase-7 expression. The active forms of all three enzymes, caspase-8, caspase-7 and A-SMase, but not caspase-3, colocalize in internalized TNF receptosomes. While caspase-8 and caspase-3 are unable to induce activation of purified pro-A-SMase, we found that caspase-7 mediates A-SMase activation by direct interaction resulting in proteolytic cleavage of the 72-kDa pro-A-SMase zymogen at the non-canonical cleavage site after aspartate 253, generating an active 57 kDa A-SMase molecule. Caspase-7 down modulation revealed the functional link between caspase-7 and A-SMase, confirming proteolytic cleavage as one further mode of A-SMase activation. Our data suggest a signalling cascade within TNF receptosomes involving sequential activation of caspase-8 and caspase-7 for induction of A-SMase activation by proteolytic cleavage of pro-A-SMase. The EMBO Journal (2011) 30, 379-394. doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.326; Published online 14 December 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available