4.8 Article

Dynamin GTPase regulation is altered by PH domain mutations found in centronuclear myopathy patients

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 18, Pages 3054-3067

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.187

Keywords

dynamin; endocytosis; GTPase; PH domain; phosphoinositide

Funding

  1. Offices of Biological and Environmental Research
  2. Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy
  3. National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health
  4. NIH [R01-GM078345]
  5. Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research [61-1316]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The large GTPase dynamin has an important membrane scission function in receptor-mediated endocytosis and other cellular processes. Self-assembly on phosphoinositide-containing membranes stimulates dynamin GTPase activity, which is crucial for its function. Although the pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain is known to mediate phosphoinositide binding by dynamin, it remains unclear how this promotes activation. Here, we describe studies of dynamin PH domain mutations found in centronuclear myopathy (CNM) that increase dynamin's GTPase activity without altering phosphoinositide binding. CNM mutations in the PH domain C-terminal a-helix appear to cause conformational changes in dynamin that alter control of the GTP hydrolysis cycle. These mutations either 'sensitize' dynamin to lipid stimulation or elevate basal GTPase rates by promoting self-assembly and thus rendering dynamin no longer lipid responsive. We also describe a low-resolution structure of dimeric dynamin from small-angle X-ray scattering that reveals conformational changes induced by CNM mutations, and defines requirements for domain rearrangement upon dynamin self-assembly at membrane surfaces. Our data suggest that changes in the PH domain may couple lipid binding to dynamin GTPase activation at sites of vesicle invagination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available