4.8 Article

Architectural roles of multiple chromatin insulators at the human apolipoprotein gene cluster

Journal

EMBO JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1234-1245

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.81

Keywords

apolipoprotein; cohesin; CTCF; enhancer; insulator

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MN)
  2. Global Center of Excellence (COE)
  3. 'Cell Fate Regulation Research and Education Unit'
  4. Kumamoto University
  5. Uehara Memorial Foundation (MN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-range regulatory elements and higher-order chromatin structure coordinate the expression of multiple genes in cluster, and CTCF/cohesin-mediated chromatin insulator may be a key in this regulation. The human apolipoprotein (APO) A1/C3/A4/A5 gene region, whose alterations increase the risk of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis, is partitioned at least by three CTCF-enriched sites and three cohesin protein RAD21-enriched sites (two overlap with the CTCF sites), resulting in the formation of two transcribed chromatin loops by interactions between insulators. The C3 enhancer and APOC3/A4/A5 promoters reside in the same loop, where the APOC3/A4 promoters are pointed towards the C3 enhancer, whereas the APOA1 promoter is present in the different loop. The depletion of either CTCF or RAD21 disrupts the chromatin loop structure, together with significant changes in the APO expression and the localization of transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-4 alpha and transcriptionally active form of RNA polymerase II at the APO promoters. Thus, CTCF/cohesin-mediated insulators maintain the chromatin loop formation and the localization of transcriptional apparatus at the promoters, suggesting an essential role of chromatin insulation in controlling the expression of clustered genes. The EMBO Journal (2009) 28, 1234-1245. doi: 10.1038/emboj. 2009.81; Published online 26 March 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available