4.5 Article

Prion protein as a mediator of neurocardiosympathetic interactions

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 33, Issue 24, Pages 3720-3727

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201200384

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Echocardiography; Isoproterenol; Left ventricular hypertrophy; Prion protein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A proteomic approach to study cardiovascular disease includes the examination of proteins associated with risk factors such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). PrPC is a host-coded membrane-bound glycoprotein found in most cell types, including myocardium, and whose physiological function is uncertain. We have taken a selective proteomic approach and performed mechanistic studies to determine whether PrPC levels are related to left ventricular (LV) structure or function. Echocardiograms were performed at baseline in 65 mice comprising three strains of the same C57Bl/6J x 129SV genetic background but expressing different levels of PrPC (wild-type mice (WT), PrP-/-, and PrPC over-expressing transgenic mice (tga20)). There were no significant differences in LV mass or LV ejection fraction between the three groups. Either normal saline (n = 60) or isoproterenol (n = 55) was then administered intraperitoneally (50 mg/kg/day) for 5 days/wk for two consecutive weeks to induce LVH. Body weight decreased significantly in the PrP-/- group (18%). On multivariate analysis, higher LV mass index posttreatment was independently associated with the tga20 group (versus PrP-/- versus WT, p = 0.002) after adjusting for treatment (isoproterenol versus saline), and weight change (r2 = 0.13 for model, p = 0.016). Therefore, PrPC appears unrelated to LV mass and function in the basal state. Isoproterenol causes transient enhancement of PrPC expression in WT mice and a more pronounced increase in tga20 mice at 2 h posttreatment. Overexpression of PrPC in the tga20 group may be associated with higher LV mass after a 2 wk regimen of isoproterenol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available