4.5 Article

A new multiplex for human identification using insertion/deletion polymorphisms

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 30, Issue 21, Pages 3682-3690

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200900274

Keywords

Forensic genetics; Human identification; Insertion/deletion polymorphism; Multiplex PCR

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/30039/2006]
  2. Programa Operacional Ciencia e Inovacao 2010 [POCI 2010]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/30039/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human identification is usually based on the study of STRs or SNPs depending on the particular characteristics of the investigation. However, other types of genetic variation such as insertion/deletion polymorphisms (indels) have considerable potential in the field of identification, since they can combine the desirable characteristics of both STRs and SNPs. In this study, a set of 38 non-coding bi-allelic autosomal indels reported to be polymorphic in African, European, and Asian populations were selected. We developed a sensitive genotyping assay, which is able to characterize all 38 bi-allelic markers using a single multiplex PCR and detected with standard CE analyzers. Amplicon length was designed to be shorter than 160 bp. Complete profiles were obtained using 0 3 na of DNA, and full genotyping of degraded samples was possible in cases where standard STR typing had partially failed. A total of 306 individuals from Angola, Mozambique, Portugal, Macau, and Taiwan were studied and population data are presented. All indels were polymorphic in the three population groups studied and the random match probabilities of the set ranged in orders of magnitude from 10(-14) to 10(-15). Therefore, the indel-plex represents a valuable approach in human identification studies, especially in challenging DNA cases, as a more straightforward and efficient alternative to SNP typing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available