4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Chromatographic evaluation and comparison of three β-cyclodextrin-based stationary phases by capillary liquid chromatography and pressure-assisted capillary electrochromatography

Journal

ELECTROPHORESIS
Volume 29, Issue 19, Pages 4045-4054

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200800036

Keywords

Capillary electrochromatography; Capillary liquid chromatography; Chiral stationary phase; Cyclodextrin; Enantiomer separation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enantiomer separations were performed on three beta-cyclodextrin-based chiral stationary phases (CSP) containing the pernaphthylcarbamoylated beta-cyclodextrin (CSP 1), peracetylated beta-cyclodextrin (CSP 2) and permethylated beta-cyclodextrin (CSP 3) as chiral selectors by capillary liquid chromatography and pressure-assisted capillary electrochromatography in this study. Triethyl ammonium acetate/MeOH or phosphate buffer/MeOH was used as the mobile phase. The experimental factors affecting chiral separations have been examined for each CSP, including pH of the buffers, methanol content and applied voltage. Under optimal separation conditions, a number of racemic compounds were resolved into their enantiomers on three cyclodextrin-based CSP. A comparative study on the performance of three CSP revealed the presence of carbonyl functional groups as well as aromatic rings in the cyclodextrin derivatives, enhanced the interaction between the analytes and CSP, and thus improved enantioselectivity of the CSp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available