4.6 Article

The electrochemical performance and CO2 reduction mechanism on strontium doped lanthanum ferrite fuel electrode in solid oxide electrolysis cell

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 159-167

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.187

Keywords

Solid oxide electrolysis cell; Strontium doped lanthanum ferrite; Carbon dioxide reduction reaction; Density functional theory

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [91645101]
  2. Anhui Estone Materials Technology Co., Ltd. [2016340022003195]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dioxide reduction reaction on the fuel electrode is critical for CO2 conversion in solid oxide electrolysis cell, which is a promising technology to utilize CO2 and store electricity from intermittent renewable resources. This work presents a highly active electrocatalyst, strontium doped lanthanum ferrite (LSF), for direct CO2 reduction reaction, which is conducted in single cells with La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3 as the electrolyte and La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta as the air electrode. A current density of 0.76 A cm(-2) is achieved at 800 degrees C and 1.5 V when pure CO2 is electrolyzed. By adding samaria-doped ceria to form composite fuel electrodes, the performance can be effectively improved. The current density increases from 0.76 to 1.06 A cm(-2) while the total interfacial polarization resistance decreases from 0.26 to 0.12 Omega cm(2). Furthermore, LSF exhibits high rate constant for CO2 reduction reaction, 1.04 x 10(-4) cm s(-1) at 700 degrees C. CO2 is favorable to form carbonate species on LSF surface, and the existence of carbonate species on LSF surface revealed by Raman spectra technique is further proved by DFT calculations. A proposed CO2 reduction mechanism is obtained, providing new insights into CO2 adsorption and dissociation on LSF surface. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available