4.6 Article

Dual-Ion Cells based on the Electrochemical Intercalation of Asymmetric Fluorosulfonyl-(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide Anions into Graphite

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 625-633

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.070

Keywords

Anion intercalation; Dual-ion cell; Graphite; Ionic liquids; Fluorosulfonyl-(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Forderinitiative Energiespeicher [03EK3031A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we investigate the electrochemical intercalation of the asymmetric fluorosulfonyl(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (FTFSI-) anion into a graphite-based cathode for application in dual-ion cells. Since FTESI- anions are smaller than bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (TFSI-) anions, a higher specific capacity can be expected as the decreased anion size should lead to an enhanced receptivity of the anions between the graphene sheets of graphite. The discharge capacity and the coulombic efficiency are studied at varying upper charging end potentials ranging from 4.8 V to 5.2 V vs. Li/Li+. At these varying conditions a discharge capacity of 43 mAh g(-1) to 99 mAh g(-1) is obtained, respectively. However, the increase of the upper cut-off potential leads also to a decrease of the coulombic efficiency. To gain a better insight into the influence of the anion size on the performance, FTFSI- and TESI- intercalation is discussed on a comparative basis, with respect to the potential range for anion intercalation/de-intercalation, the discharge capacity and efficiency. We observed a lower coulombic efficiency, caused by the lower electrochemical stability, as well as an enhanced discharge capacity for all investigated upper cut-off potentials for the intercalation/de-intercalation of FTESI- compared to TFSI- anion uptake/release. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available