4.6 Article

Preparation and Electrochemical Performance of Yttrium-doped Li[Li0.20Mn0.534Ni0.133Co0.133]O2 as Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 22-30

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.155

Keywords

Yttrium-doping; layered lithium-rich Cathode Materials; Lithium-Ion Batteries

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61171008, 21103024]
  2. Dalian Mingjia Metal Products Co., Ltd
  3. Shanghai Jubo Energy Technology Co., Ltd
  4. Dunhuang Libo Technology Co., Ltd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve the cycling performance and rate capability of the promising layered lithium-rich cathode materials, we substitute Co3+ in Li[Li0.20Mn0.534Ni0.133 Co-0.133]O-2 with unusually larga Y3+ during coprecipitation and synthesize Li[Li0.20Mn0.534 Ni0.133Co0.133-x Y-x]O-2 (0 <= x <= 0.0665). The influences of yttrium content on the electrochemical properties of the lithium-rich materials are investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), galvanostatic charge-discharge tests and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques. The charge-discharge cycling tests suggest that after heating at 1223 K in air for 10 h, the material with x = 0.00665 deliver a high discharge capacity of 349.7 mAhg(-1) after 1 cycle and 225.2 mAhg(-1) after 80 cycles with a current rate of 0.1 C between 2.0 and 4.6V vs., Li/Li+. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy indicates that Li[Li0.20Mn0.534Ni0.133Co0.133-xYx]O-2 electrode has lower impedance during cycling. The higher capacity retention and high-rate capability of yttrium-substituted materials can be ascribed to the expanded Li+ diffusing channels in the layered structure, lower surface film resistance and lower charge transfer resistance of the electrode during cycling. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available