4.6 Article

Carbon black/sulfur-doped graphene composite prepared by pyrolysis of graphene oxide with sodium polysulfide for oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 51-60

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.108

Keywords

Graphene nanosheet; Sulfur modified graphene; Oxygen reduction reaction; Carbon black

Funding

  1. University of Isfahan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfur doped graphene nanosheets (S-GNs) are synthesized by using graphene oxide (GO) as carbon source and sodium polysulfide as sulfur source, and then, annealing the prepared precursors (S-GO) at different temperatures up to 1000 degrees C. The structure and morphological characteristics of the fabricated composites are investigated by Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and electrochemical methods. Electrochemical results show that S-GNs has high catalytic activity toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in an alkaline electrolyte in comparison with GNs. To improve the characteristics of S-GNs and prevent agglomeration of the particles, the S-GNs-1000-CB is fabricated by mixing the S-GNs-1000 with the carbon black (CB). The results show that CB particles inserted between S-GNs layers function as spacers and prevent the restacking of S-GNs during drying, and thus, most probably promote the diffusion of O-2 molecules through S-GNs and enhance the ORR rate. The S-GNs-1000-CB composites show excellent electrocatalytic activity in alkaline solutions over all the studied (catalyst) samples. Our findings demonstrate that S-GNs-1000-CB is an appropriate catalyst for ORR in alkaline solutions, and could be a good candidate for replacement of the precious Pt based catalysts for this goal. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available