4.6 Article

Filtration properties of hierarchical carbon nanostructures deposited on carbon fibre fabrics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/11/115305

Keywords

carbon nanotubes; chemical vapour deposition; heirarchical structure; carbon fibre; graphene oxide; water filter; Rhodamine B

Funding

  1. European Union LLP-Erasmus Programme
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/J500562, EP/K503186]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F052901/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/F052901/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hierarchical carbon nanostructures have been produced and examined for their use in liquid filtration experiments. The nanostructures are based on carbon nanotube growth and graphite oxide sponge deposition on the surface of commercially available carbon fibre fabrics. The hierarchical nanomaterial construction on the carbon fibre fabric is made possible due to the chemical vapour deposited carbon nanotubes which act as anchoring sites for the solution deposited sponge nanomaterial. The nanomaterials show a high capacity for Rhodamine B filtration, with the carbon fibre-carbon nanotube-graphite oxide sponge fabric showing filtering performance comparable to a commercial activated carbon filter. After 40 successive filtrations of 10 mg ml(-1) Rhodamine B solution, the filtrate of dual modified fabrics returned an increase in transparency of 94% when measured at approx. 550 nm compared to 72% for the commercial carbon filter. When normalised with respect to the areal density of the commercial filter, the increase in optical transparency of the filtrate from the dual modified fabrics reduces to 65%. The Rhodamine B is found to deposit in the carbon nanomaterials via a nucleation, growth and saturation mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available