4.6 Article

Charge-discharge behavior of graphite negative electrodes in bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide-based ionic liquid and structural aspects of their electrode/electrolyte interfaces

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages 181-190

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.018

Keywords

Ionic liquids; Bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide; Double layer structure; Lithium-ion battery; Graphite negative electrode

Funding

  1. MEXT
  2. [21350106]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23655182] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the charge-discharge behavior of four types of graphite electrode, including raw synthetic graphite (SG), shaped natural graphite (NG), soft carbon-coated natural graphite (SCNG), and hard carbon-coated natural graphite (HCNG), in a 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (EMImESI) ionic liquid. Based on the charge-discharge curves for the first cycle in LiTESI/EMIrriFSI, capacity loss arising from an irreversible reaction on the graphite anodes was clearly observed for the cells consisting of SG and SCNG, whereas the capacity loss for the cells containing NC and HCNG was relatively low. The coulombic efficiency during cell cycling also confirmed that the charge-discharge behavior of graphite in LiTFSI/EMImESI is strongly affected by the surface structure of the graphite and that basal-plane-oriented graphite, such as NC and HCNG, can reduce the primary charge capacity loss. The advantages of the stable charge-discharge behavior provided by FSI-based ionic liquids for lithium ion batteries are also discussed based on the application of voltammetric and electrochemical impedance techniques to model carbon electrodes in ionic liquids. Based on these analyses, a mechanism involving a double-layer-based interface (not a solid electrolyte interface (SEI)) is proposed to stabilize the surface of graphite negative electrodes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available