4.6 Article

Simple synthesis and particle size effects of TiO2 nanoparticle anodes for rechargeable lithium ion batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 112-118

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.104

Keywords

Anatase TiO2; Anode; Particle size; Electrochemical properties; Li-ion batteries

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science Technology (MEST) [R32-20074]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Basic Research Laboratories (BRL) Program [2011-0001567]
  3. Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation
  4. WCU (World Class University) program through the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urea-assisted auto-combustion synthesis was used for the easy and scalable preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles for use as anodes in lithium-ion batteries. The prepared TiO2 powder was annealed at 300 degrees C, 400 degrees C, 500 degrees C and 600 degrees C to optimize the system and assess the effects of particle size on electrochemical properties. X-ray diffraction patterns confirmed that pure anatase phase TiO2 formed at up to 500 degrees C, above which mixed phases of anatase and rutile emerged. Field-emission transmission electron microscopy showed that spherical particles of 8-25 nm were formed. The electrochemical performances of annealed TiO2 samples were tested by charging/discharging, C-rate measurement and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. It was clearly found that the crystal particle size has a striking impact on the Li insertion behavior and lithium storage capability. TiO2 nanoparticles electrode annealed at lower temperature 300 degrees C showed high rate capability, excellent capacity retention and high electrical conductivity due to its very small particles and nonideal crystal lattices. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available