4.6 Article

Tin indium oxide/graphene nanosheet nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium ion batteries with enhanced lithium storage capacity and rate capability

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 275-281

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.070

Keywords

Tin indium oxide; Graphene; Anode; Lithium ion batteries

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [K2070400000307A050000310]
  2. Global Research Laboratory Program
  3. International Cooperation program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  4. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [2011T100100369]
  5. World Class University program through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  6. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-10092]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tin oxide (SnO2) is a promising candidate as an anode for lithium ion batteries because of its high theoretical capacity. However, poor capacity retention caused by large volume changes during cycling, large initial irreversible capacity, and low rate capability frustrate its practical application. We have developed a ternary nanocomposite based on tin indium oxide (SnO2-In2O3) and graphene nanosheet (GNS) synthesized via a facile solvothermal method. The incorporation of In2O3 into SnO2 can improve the electrochemical property of SnO2 and reduce the charge transfer resistance of electrode leading to the enhanced reversible capacity and rate capability. The graphene nanosheet in the composite electrode can accommodate high volume expansion/contraction during cycling resulting in excellent capacity retention. As an anode for lithium ion batteries, the SnO2-In2O3/GNS nanocomposite exhibits a remarkably improved electrochemical performance in terms of lithium storage capacity (962 mAh g(-1) at 60 mA g(-1) rate), initial coulombic efficiency (57.2%), cycling stability (60.8% capacity retention after 50 cycles), and rate capability (393.25 mAh g(-1) at 600 mA g(-1) rate after 25 cycles) compared to SnO2/GNS and pure SnO2-In2O3 electrode. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available