4.6 Article

Controllable syntheses of α- and δ-MnO2 as cathode catalysts for zinc-air battery

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 161-165

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.088

Keywords

Oxygen reduction; Manganese dioxide; Chemical synthesis; Catalyst; Zinc-air battery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21273084]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [10351063101000001]
  3. Cooperation Project of Industries, Universities and Research Institutes in Guangdong Province [2011B090400317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four MnO2 samples were synthesized through a simple reaction of KMnO4 with high-purity graphite in different concentrations of sulfuric acid at low temperature. Their morphology, crystal structure and performance as cathode catalysts of zinc-air battery were investigated with X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transformation infrared spectrometer (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and electrochemical tests. It is found that the crystal structure and the morphology of the synthesized samples depend on the sulfuric acid concentration. The synthesized samples have large specific surface area and exhibit excellent performance compared to the commercial electrolytic manganese dioxide (gamma-MnO2). Two varieties of manganese dioxides, delta-MnO2 (the as-prepared samples a and b) and alpha-MnO2 (the as-prepared sample c and d), were obtained when using low and high sulfuric acid concentration, respectively. Higher sulfuric acid concentration favors the agglomeration of the particles. The specific surface area of samples a, b, c, d, and gamma-MnO2 is 83.2, 81.1, 88.5, 86.8, and 43.5 m(2) g(-1), corresponding to discharge capacity of zinc-air batteries is 169.5, 160.3, 175.2, 171.5, and 112.2 mAh, respectively. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available