4.6 Article

Cycling effects on surface morphology, nanomechanical and interfacial reliability of LiMn2O4 cathode in thin film lithium ion batteries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 52-59

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.032

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; LiMn2O4 Thin film cathode; Nanoindentation; AFM; Interfacial reliability

Funding

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore [0721340051 (R-265-000-292-305)]
  2. Ministry of Education, Singapore through National University of Singapore [R265-000-305-112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of Li+ intercalation/deintercalation processes on surface morphology, nanomechanical and interfacial properties of sputtered LiMn2O4 cathode film are studied using various techniques, including ex situ field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), atomic force microscope (AFM), nanoindentation tests combining with focused ion beam (FIB) sectioning. The results reveal that the spinel LiMn2O4 cathode film shows good cycling performance and morphology stability, accompanying with a slight increase of surface roughness mainly due to the agglomeration of nano-grains caused by phase transformations. The cathode film mechanically fails due to the stress induced by the lattice parameter change upon Li+ intercalation/deintercalation and lattice mismatch related to inhomogeneous phase transformation as well as the Jahn-Teller distortion in the 4V region. The induced stress in the film causes the fragmentation of grains and the initiation/propagation of micro-cracks, leading to the mechanical degradation. The non-uniformity, micro-cracks and nanomechanical degradation have harmful effects on the electrical contact of LiMn2O4 cathode film, resulting in the capacity fading of the lithium ion battery. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available