4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Influence of the gold nanoparticles electrodeposition method on Hg(II) trace electrochemical detection

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 15-22

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.10.101

Keywords

Gold nanoparticles; Electrodeposition mode comparison; Modified electrode characterization; Hg(II) trace determination; Anodic stripping detection

Funding

  1. Fondation STAE (Sciences et Technologies pour l'Aeronautique et l'Espace) under the acronym MAISOE (Microlaboratoires d'Analyses In Situ pour des Observatoires Environnementaux)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were deposited on Glassy Carbon (GC) substrate by using three electrochemical techniques: Cyclic Voltammetry (CV), Chronoamperometry (CA) and Potentiostatic Double-Pulse (PDP). For each electrodeposition method, the resulting AuNPs-modified electrodes were characterized by CV in H2SO4 and Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscopy (FEG-SEM). CA was found to be the best electrodeposition mode for controlling the morphology and the density of AuNPs. The modified electrodes were used for low Hg(II) concentration detection using Square Wave Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (SWASV). AuNPs obtained by CA afforded the best amperometric response while involving the lowest amount of charge during the electrodeposition step (Q(Au(III))). This analytical response is correlated to both the smallest particle size (ca. 17 nm in diameter) and the highest particle density (332 particles mu m(-2)), thus displaying high electrode effective surface area. In these optimal conditions, using a Hg(II) preconcentration time of 300 s, the nanosensor array exhibited a linearity range from 0.80 to 9.9 nM with a sensitivity of 1.16 mu A nM(-1). A detection limit of 0.40 nM (s/n =3) was reached. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available