4.6 Article

Improving rate capability of high potential LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x cathode materials via increasing oxygen non-stoichiometries

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 45-50

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.022

Keywords

Lithium nickel manganese oxide; Oxygen non-stoichiometries; Rate capability; Lithium ion batteries

Funding

  1. Industrial Technology Research Institute of Taiwan, R.O.C.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To meet demands on lithium ion batteries for high power applications, the rate capability of cathode materials has to be greatly improved. In this study, a significant improvement of rate capability in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x was obtained by the aid of elevated oxygen non-stoichiometries. Various oxygen non-stoichiometries were achieved through calcining LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 above the onset temperature of oxygen loss at 700 degrees C. No obvious second phases were observed in XRD patterns of as-synthesized LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x powders. However, the crystallographic structure transformation of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x was observed in FTIR analysis as x increased from 0.015 to 0.025, accompanying the expansion in cell parameters. Mixed phases, composing of both cation-ordered phase (P4(3)32) and cation-disordered phases (Fd-3m) at 700 degrees C, transformed into the single phase (Fd-3m) at 730 degrees C. Electrochemical test shows that LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x with lower oxygen non-stoichiometries displayed the deteriorated performance at elevated discharge rate. In contrast, LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x with higher oxygen non-stoichiometries demonstrated a significantly enhanced rate capability, attributing to the disordered structure (Fd-3m) and elevated Mn3+ contents. With respect to LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x (x=0.015), the discharge capacity of both LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-x (x = 0.025 and 0.033) cathodes greatly improved about 33% and 47% at 3C and 5C, respectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available