4.6 Article

On the nature of the hydroxyl radicals produced at boron-doped diamond and Ebonex® anodes

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 275-281

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.097

Keywords

Hydroxyl radicals; Non-active anodes; Boron-doped diamond; Ebonex

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identity of the proximal oxidant at non-active anodes, such as boron-doped diamond (BDD), is proposed to be a hydroxyl radical species sorbed to the anode surface. Attack by this species initiates full or partial mineralization of an added substrate. In this work, we attempt to discuss critical evidence previously presented about the nature of these hydroxyl species. First, we argue that the observation of spin adducts of (OH)-O-center dot in the presence of nitrone spin traps cannot exclude an alternative route to the spin adduct, involving oxidation of the spin trap and nucleophilic attack of water. Next, we find that the anodic oxidation of coumarin to the fluorescent 7-hydroxy derivative is a useful qualitative probe for hydroxyl radicals, but it is a minor reaction pathway that takes place principally in the bulk solution, rather than at the anode surface. Finally, we used competition kinetics, in which the oxidation of two or more substrates is followed simultaneously, as a method that does not depend on analysis of reaction products. At BDD, this method showed the reactivity of the hydroxyl species to be similar, but not identical, to that of free (OH)-O-center dot(aq). Ebonex, a conductive ceramic material of approximate composition Ti4O7, also behaves as a non-active anode. At Ebonex, the hydroxyl species appears to be less abundant but more reactive than at BDD. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available