4.6 Article

Bivalent tin ion assisted reduction for preparing graphene/SnO2 composite with good cyclic performance and lithium storage capacity

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 56, Issue 21, Pages 7340-7346

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.06.037

Keywords

Co-precipitation; GNS/SnO2 composite; Graphene; Lithium storage; Anode material

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [10YZ03, 10YZ05]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [09ZR1411800, 10ZR1411300]
  3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes (ECNU)
  4. Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (ECUST)
  5. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [S30109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Co-precipitation method of SnCl2 center dot 2H(2)O and graphene oxide (GO) solution was performed to fleetly prepare graphene/SnO2 composite. The structure and composition of the nanocomposite were detected by means of XRD, SEM, TEM and FT-IR. The GO was reduced by bivalent tin ions to graphene nanosheet (GNS) via solution reaction and SnO2 nano-crystals with size of 4-6 nm were homogeneously distributed on the matrix of GNS. It was found that the disorder degree of graphene in GNS/SnO2 composite prepared by the bivalent tin ion assisted reduction method was much lower than that of GNS obtained via pyrolysis reduction. The possible mechanism for this phenomenon was discussed in detail. The N-2 adsorption tests showed an ink-bottle-like pore structure of GNS/SnO2 and the SnO2 nanoparticles were confined in the interlayer of GNS without agglomeration. These structural features were desirable and enabled GNS/SnO2 an excellent anode material in lithium ion battery. The electrochemical tests showed that the composite could deliver a reversible capacity of 775.3 mAh/g and capacity retention of 98% after 50 cycles. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available