4.6 Article

Comparison of electrochemical method with ozonation, chlorination and monochloramination in drinking water disinfection

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 56, Issue 27, Pages 9789-9796

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.053

Keywords

Electrochemical disinfection; Ozone; Chlorine; Monochloramine; SEM

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20877001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical process in chloride-free electrolytes was proved to be powerful in disinfection due to the strong oxidants produced in the electrolysis and no formation of disinfection byproducts (DBPs). In this study, disinfection experiments were conducted by electrochemical treatment compared with ordinary and advanced methods (ozonation, chlorination and monochloramination), with Escherichia coli (E. coli) K-12, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) A106, Bacillus subtilis (BST) and an isolated Bacillus as the representative microorganisms. Firstly, factor tests were performed on E. coli to obtain the optimal conditions of the four disinfection procedures. At their respective optimal condition, CT (concentration of disinfectant x contact time) value of a 4-log E. coli inactivation was 33.5, 1440, 1575, 1674 mg min L(-1) for electrochemical process, ozonation, chlorination and monochloramination, respectively. It was demonstrated that the disinfection availability was in the following order: electrochemical process > ozonation > chlorination > monochloramination, which could be attributed to the hydroxyl radical generated in the electrolysis, with strong oxidizing ability and non-selectivity compared with the other three disinfectants. Moreover, the disinfection efficacy of the four disinfection procedures was compared for four different bacteria. It was found that the disinfection efficacy was similar for the selected four bacteria in electrochemical process, while in the other three treatments inactivation of the two Bacillus was much slower than E. coli and S. aureus. As a result, the non-selectivity of electrochemical disinfection with BDD anode to different kinds of microorganisms was further proved, which was primarily controlled by the hydroxyl radicals existed in the free state. For each bacterium, the order of disinfection availability of the four processes was consistent. Finally, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was implemented to observe the cell morphology. It was shown that cell surface damage was more obvious in electrochemical system with strong oxidants compared with that after ozone treatment, while the integrity of cells were not affected in weak oxidizing chlorine and monochloramine. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available