4.6 Article

Effect of the TiO2 shell thickness on the dye-sensitized solar cells with ZnO-TiO2 core-shell nanorod electrodes

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 19-24

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.068

Keywords

ZnO nanorods; Hydrothermal; ZnO-TiO2 core-shell structure; Chemical vapor deposition; Dye-sensitized solar cell

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Well-aligned ZnO nanorod arrays with high aspect ratio have been grown on FTO substrate by hydrothermal process. FTO substrate was pre-modified with ZnO thin film as a seed layer by sol-gel coating. TiO2 thin shells with different thicknesses were grown on the ZnO nanorods by chemical vapor deposition method. Sample characterization was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), electron microscopy (FESEM. TEM, and SAD). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and UV-vis Spectroscopy. XRD and TEM analyses indicated a wurtzite structured with high crystallinity and confirmed that each individual ZnO nanorod was a single crystal. The photoelectrochemical experiments were performed in a sandwich type two-electrode cell and I-V curves were obtained. Result of solar cell testing showed that addition of TiO2 shells to ZnO nanorod significantly increased the J(SC), V-OC, fill factor and efficiency relative to devices without TiO2 shells. Overall cell efficiency jumped from 0.45% for bare ZnO nanorod array to 0.92% for 14 nm thick TiO2 shells on ZnO which showed a twofold increase. The fill factor increased from 0.37 to 0.60, showing a 62% improvement. For a shell with thickness of 21 nm, V-OC increased by about 150 mV to 0.68 V. The results showed that it is possible to fabricate core-shell cells of higher efficiency by using nanorod arrays and other morphologies with larger surface area. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available