4.6 Article

Role of the diffuse layer in acidic and alkaline fuel cells

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 56, Issue 12, Pages 4518-4525

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.060

Keywords

Alkaline fuel cell; Acidic electrolyte; Alkaline electrolyte; Electric double layer; Laminar flow fuel cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A numerical model is developed to study electrolyte dependent kinetics in fuel cells. The model is based on the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) and generalized-Frumkin-Butler-Volmer (gFBV) equations, and is used to understand how the diffuse layer and ionic transport play a role in the performance difference between acidic and alkaline systems. The laminar flow fuel cell (LFFC) is used as the model fuel cell architecture to allow for the appropriate comparison of equivalent acidic and alkaline systems. We study the overall cell performance and individual electrode polarizations of acidic and alkaline fuel cells for both balanced and unbalanced electrode kinetics as well as in the presence of transport limitations. The results predict cell behavior based on electrolyte composition that strongly correlates with observed experimental results from literature and provides insight into the fundamental cause of these results. Specifically, it is found that the working ion concentration at the reaction plane plays a significant role in fuel cell performance including activation losses and the response to different kinetic rates at an individual electrode. The working ion and the electrode where its consumed are different for acidic and alkaline fuel cells. Therefore, we compare the role of the diffuse region in both acidic and alkaline fuel cells. From this we conclude that oxidant reduction at the cathode and slow fuel oxidation (such as alcohol oxidation) can be improved with an alkaline electrolyte. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available