4.6 Article

Binary CuO/Co3O4 nanofibers for ultrafast and amplified electrochemical sensing of fructose

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 56, Issue 27, Pages 10191-10196

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.001

Keywords

CuO/Co3O4 nanofibers; Electrospun; Enzymeless; Fructose sensor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20543003, 21075048]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cobalt oxide-doped copper oxide composite nanofibers (CCNFs) were successfully achieved via electrospinning followed by thermal treatment processes and then exploited as active electrode material for direct enzyme-free fructose detection. The morphology and the structure of as-prepared samples were investigated by X-ray diffraction spectrum (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The electrocatalytic activity of CCNFs films towards fructose oxidation and sensing performances were evaluated by conventional electrochemical techniques. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (I-t) revealed the distinctly enhanced sensing properties towards fructose compared to pure copper oxide nanofibers (CNFs), i.e., showing significantly lowered overpotential of 0.30V, ultrafast (1 s) and ultrasensitive (18.988 mu A mM(-1)) current response in a wide linear range of 1.0 x 10(-5) M to 6.0 x 10(-3) M with satisfied reproducibility and stability, which could be ascribed to the synergic catalytic effect of the binary CuO/Co3O4 composite nanofibers and the highly porous three-dimensional network films structure of the CCNFs. In addition, a good selectivity for fructose detection was achieved. Results in this work demonstrated that CCNFs is one of the promising catalytic electrode materials for enzymeless fructose sensor fabrication. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available