4.6 Article

Formation kinetics and stability of phosphonate self-assembled monolayers on indium-tin oxide

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 56, Issue 13, Pages 4828-4833

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.021

Keywords

Self-assembled monolayer; Phosphonic acid; Formation kinetics; Stability; Indium-tin oxide

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0020772, 2009-0072062]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  3. LG YONAM Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphonate self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) have been widely used for the surface modification of indium-tin oxide (ITO) electrodes; however, their formation kinetics and stability are not well understood. In this paper, we describe our electrochemical studies of the formation kinetics and stability of a series of phosphonate SAMs on ITO electrodes. In particular electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) and cyclic voltammetric (CV) measurements have been carried out on three carboxy-terminated phosphonate SAMs by using Fe(CN)(6)(3-/4-) as redox indicators. The dependence of the charge-transfer resistance (obtained from the EIS plots) on the incubation time allows an estimation of the apparent fractional surface coverage of phosphonate SAMs. The apparent formation rate constant (k(obs)) was determined by fitting the experimental data to a Langmuir adsorption model. For 3-phosphonopropanoic acid (PPA), the k(obs) value increases when the PPA concentration increases in the deposition solution, and is smaller than those of thiolate SAMs on Au. The stability of phosphonate SAMs was investigated in three different media (pure water, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and ambient air condition). It has been shown that the phosphonate SAMs are rather stable in either PBS solution or ambient air condition. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available