4.6 Article

An electrochemical methanol sensor based on a Pd-Ni/SiNWs catalytic electrode

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 55, Issue 17, Pages 5019-5023

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.013

Keywords

Electrochemical methanol sensor; Palladium-nickel/silicon nanowires; Catalytic electrode; Electroless plating

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60672002]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [09ZZ46]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel electrochemical methanol sensor based on a catalytic electrode of palladium-nickel/silicon nanowires (Pd-Ni/SiNWs) is presented in this paper. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). and electrochemical methods are employed to investigate the Pd-Ni/SiNWs electrode materials. These nanocomposite materials exhibit a highly ordered, wire-like structure with a wire length of similar to 50 mu m and a wire diameter ranging from 100 to 300 nm. The substrate has good electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of methanol in alkaline solutions. The performances of the prototype sensor are characterized by cyclic voltammetry and fixed potential amperometry techniques. In a 1 mol L-1 KOH solution containing different methanol concentrations, the sensor exhibits a good sensitivity of 1.96 mA mmol(-1) L cm(-2) with R-2 = 0.99 and the corresponding detection limit of 18 mu mol L-1 (signal-to-noise ratio = 3, S/N = 3) for cyclic voltammetry. Meanwhile, the electrode also displays a sensitivity of 0.48 mA mmol(-1) L cm(-2) with R-2 = 0.98 and the corresponding detection limit of 25 mu mol L-1 (S/N = 3) for a fixed potential amperometry at -0.3 V versus an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. The results demonstrate that the Pd-Ni/SiNWs catalytic electrode has potential as an efficient and integrated sensor for methanol detection. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available