4.6 Review

Facile synthesis and superior anodic performance of ultrafine SnO2-containing nanocomposites

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 54, Issue 24, Pages 5782-5788

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.05.030

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; Anode material; Nanocomposite; SnO2; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [50730003, 50672025]
  2. Ministry of Science & Technology of China [2007BAE55B00]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA05Z311]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrafine SnO2-containing nanocomposites were synthesized from glucose/SnCl2 acid solution under hydrothermal environment. The content of SnO2 in the nanocomposites could be adjusted by changing the mass ratio of SnCl2 to glucose in the initial solution. The crystalline structure and morphology of the as-synthesized nanocomposites have been characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The results revealed that the nanocomposites were composed of highly dispersing SnO2 nanoparticles with the sizes of only a few nanometers (3-5 nm). Electrochemical tests demonstrated that the electrochemical performances were strongly dependent on the content of SnO2 in the nanocomposites. The nanocomposites containing 75 wt.% SnO2 exhibited an outstanding reversible capacity of(310 mAh/g and high capacity retention after 200 cycles. The extraordinary performance should originate from the very small size of SnO2 nanoparticles and carbon precursor matrix derived from glucose which can confer the ability to accommodate the volume changes and prevent the agglomeration of Sn particles during charge/discharge process. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available