4.6 Article

Iron porphyrin-based cathode catalysts for PEM fuel cells: Influence of pyrolysis gas on activity and stability

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 54, Issue 26, Pages 6622-6630

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.058

Keywords

Oxygen reduction; Non-precious metal catalysts; Proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. General Motors of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fe-based catalysts for the 02 reduction in acidic medium were prepared by impregnating chloro-iron tetramethoxyphenylporphyrin (Cl-FeTMPP) on a non-microporous carbon black and heat-treating the resulting material at 950 degrees C either in NH3 (Mode 1) or in Ar (Mode 2). The most active catalyst using Mode I has a Fe bulk content of 0.4 wt% and an activity of 17 mA mg(-1) at 0.8 V in fuel cell. This activity is controlled by the microporous surface area of the catalyst. The most active catalysts using Mode 2 has an Fe bulk content of 3.7 wt% and an activity of 1.9 mA mg(-1) at 0.8 V in fuel cell. In Mode 2, the nitrogen and/or the iron surface concentrations control the activity. Concerning stability, Mode 1-catalysts are unstable while Mode 2-catalysts show stability for at least 15 h when at least 66 wt% ClFeTMPP is impregnated onto N330 and heat-treated at 950 degrees C in Ar.The catalyst made with 66 wt% Cl-FeTMPP has a bulk Fe content of 5.2 wt% and an activity of 1.3 mA mg(-1) at 0.8 V in fuel cell. Thus, in the present study, pyrolysis in NH3 gives active but unstable catalysts while pyrolysis in argon gives less active but more stable catalysts at high Cl-FeTMPP loading. Graphitization of Cl-FeTMPP during pyrolysis in argon seems to impart stability. Mode 2-catalysts are stable in spite of a high peroxide yield of 26% while Mode 1-catalysts are unstable in spite of a low 5% peroxide yield. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available