4.6 Article

Effect of acidic etching and fluoride treatment on corrosion performance in Mg alloy AZ91D (MgAlZn)

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 250-257

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.08.046

Keywords

Magnesium alloys; Corrosion; Etching; Surface pre-treatment; ToF-SIMS; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

Funding

  1. DFG (German Research Foundation)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluoride activation of Mg AZ91D die-cast alloy surfaces by ammonium fluoride pre-treatment is an important procedure in industry. The procedure forms a fluoride rich layer on the surface enabling the formation of coatings in a uniform manner during further treatments. The present study explores the time dependence of the sequential two-step pre-treatment process - acid etching in H2SO4 (first step) and steeping in NH4F (second step) - on the corrosion properties of AZ91 D alloy. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) show the alpha phase to be selectively etched via a peelingoff mechanism that eventually leads to the undercutting and undermining of the beta-phase network. After ammonium fluoride treatment, variations in structure and chemical composition of the fluoride rich layer were shown to depend on the underlying phase of the alloy surface by SEM and time-of-flight secondary-ion-mass-spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS). After step 1 (acid etching), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in 3.5% NaCl solution indicates greater charge transfer resistance (R-t) for samples of greater exposed beta surface area. This greater R-t increases after step 2 (NH4F steeping). Furthermore, the corrosion protection properties of F-coated AZ91D can be significantly enhanced by optimizing the durations of the two pre-treatment steps. Indeed, over extension of the duration of either step 1 or step 2 leads to deterioration of the overall corrosion resistance. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available