4.6 Article

Effect of reduction conditions on electrocatalytic activity of a ternary PtNiCr/C catalyst for methanol electro-oxidation

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 54, Issue 10, Pages 2837-2842

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.027

Keywords

Methanol electro-oxidation; Direct methanol fuel cell; Hydrogen reduction; Chemical reduction; Chronoamperometry

Funding

  1. U.S. Army CECOM RDEC [DAAB07-03-3-K414]
  2. Army Research Office [W911QX06C0117, W911 NF08C0037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of reduction conditions on a Pt28Ni36Cr36/C catalyst was investigated by using two different reduction methods: hydrogen reduction and NaBH4 reduction. In hydrogen reduced catalysts, dissolution of metallic Ni and Cr was observed during cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests, and a larger amount of Ni and Cr was dissolved when reduced at higher temperatures. For methanol electro-oxidation, the highest specific current density of 1.70 A m(-2) at 600s of the chronoamperometry tests was observed in the catalyst reduced at 300 degrees C, which was similar to 24 times that of a Pt/C catalyst (0.0685 A m(-2)). In NaBH4 reduced catalysts, formation of an amorphous phase and a more Pt-rich surface was observed in X-ray diffraction and CV results, respectively, with increasing amounts of NaBH4. When reduced by 50 times of the stoichiometric amount of NaBH4, the PtNiCr/C catalyst (PtNiCr-50t) showed a current density of 34.1 A g(noble metal)(-1), which was 81% higher than the 18.8 A g(noble metal)(-1) value of a PtRu/C catalyst at 600 s of the chronoamperometry tests. After 13 h of chronoamperometry testing, the activity of the PtNiCr-50t (15.0 A g(noble metal)(-1)) was 110% higher than the PtRu/C catalyst (7.15 A g(noble metal)(-1)). The PtNiCr/C catalyst shows promise as a Ru-free methanol oxidation catalyst. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available