4.6 Article

Particle size effect of Li[Ni0.5Mn0.5]O2 prepared by co-precipitation

Journal

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 53, Issue 20, Pages 6033-6037

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.106

Keywords

co-precipitation; hydroxide; LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2; positive electrode; lithium; battery

Funding

  1. National IT Industry Promotion Agency (NIPA), Republic of Korea [C1090-0801-0029] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1908] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spherical (Ni0.5Mn0.5)(OH)(2) with different secondary particle size (3 mu m, 10 mu m in diameter) was synthesized by co-precipitation method. Mixture of the prepared hydroxide and lithium hydroxide was calcined at 950 degrees C for 20 h in air. X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that the prepared material had a typical layered structure with R (3) over barm space group. Spherical morphologies with mono-dispersed powders were observed by scanning electron microscopy. It was found that the layered Li[Ni0.5Mn0.5]O-2 delivered an initial discharge capacity of 148 mAh g(-1) (3.0-4.3 V)though the particle sizes were different. Li[Ni0.5Mn0.5]O-2 having smaller particle size (3 mu m) showed improved area specific impedance due to the reduced Li+ diffusion path, compared with that of Li[Ni0.5Mn0.5]O-2 possessing larger particle size (10 mu m). Although the Li[Ni0.5Mn0.5]O-2 (3 mu m) was electrochemically delithiated to Li-0.39[Ni0.5Mn0.5]O-2, the resulting exother. mic onset temperature was around 295 degrees C, of which the value is significantly higher than that of highly delithiated Li1-delta CoO2 (similar to 180 degrees C). (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available