4.6 Article

Composite cathode for IT-SOFC: Sr-doped lanthanum cuprate and Gd-doped ceria

Journal

ELECTROCHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 808-811

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.03.039

Keywords

Cathode; Citrate combustion synthesis; La1.96Sr0.04CuO4+delta; Electrochemical performance; IT-SOFCs

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2008-0062204]
  2. Center for ERC [2008-0062206]
  3. Korea government (MSET)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0062204] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Composite cathodes were synthesized via a citrate combustion method followed by an organic precipitation method. The cathodes were of K2NiF4-type crystal structure with x wt.% Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 (CGO)-(100 - x) wt. % La1.96Sr0.04CuO4+delta (LSC), where x=0, 10, 20 and 30. The individual structural phases of the composite cathodes were characterized using a third-generation synchrotron source beamline powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The porous grain morphology of the CGO-LSC cathode composite for a symmetrical half-cell was determined from cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy images and elemental line profiles. The composite cathode was made of 20 wt.% CGO-80 wt.% LSC (CL20-80) and was coated onto a Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 electrolyte. It showed the lowest area specific resistance (ASR) of 0.07 Omega cm(2) at 750 degrees C. An electrolyte-supported (300 mu m thick) single-cell configuration of CL20-80/CGO/Ni-CGO attained a maximum power density of 626 mW cm(-2) at 700 degrees C. The unique composite composition of CL20-80 demonstrates enhanced electrochemical performance and good chemical compatibility with the CGO electrolyte, as compared with the pure LSC (CLO-100) cathode for IT-SOFCs. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available