4.5 Article

Permeability of Human Tooth Surfaces Studied In Vitro by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

Journal

ELECTROANALYSIS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 1033-1038

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.201100726

Keywords

Human tooth; Permeability; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Surface quality

Funding

  1. MICINN
  2. Procter and Gamble Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical Faradaic impedance spectroscopy was applied to evaluate dependence of the electrical resistance on human teeth. The experiments were performed using iodide anions as a redox probe to model permeability of teeth for fluoride upon an iontophoresis process. Tooth molars were used as these are teeth most affected by tooth decay processes in vivo. Teeth compared included sound molars with no evidence of pit and fissure decay, teeth with pits and fissures regarded clinically as showing signs of decay, and teeth with crowns removed to present exposed dentin surfaces. A difference of more than an order of magnitude in electrical resistance was observed between sound molars and those regarded as showing evidence of tooth decay processes. Sound dentin, as expected from structural considerations demonstrated significantly lower resistance when compared to sound molars. Importantly, the difference in tooth resistance measured between carious and sound molars was shown to be much more representative of their structural integrity than comparison of digitally processed images of the teeth. The results support the utility of electrochemical Faradaic impedance spectroscopy for the development of understanding on how tooth electrical resistance may vary according to structural changes. This understanding may be useful to continued refinements in the use of electrical resistance measures as caries diagnostics and support generically the potential for iontophoretic processes in in-office fluoride treatments of teeth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available