4.2 Article

Dual-stator Interior Permanent Magnet Vernier Machine Having Torque Density and Power Factor Improvement

Journal

ELECTRIC POWER COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS
Volume 42, Issue 15, Pages 1717-1726

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15325008.2014.950360

Keywords

torque density; permanent magnet vernier machine; dual stator; AC machines; power factor; finite-element method

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2013R1A2A2A01068022]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013R1A2A2A01068022] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

-An improved topology for a low-speed permanent magnet vernier machine, called a dual-stator interior permanent magnet vernier machine, is introduced to significantly increase torque density and power factor. A dual-stator is adopted in the design for more torque and improving space utilization. An interior spoke-type magnet array in the rotor is designed for magnet flux focusing, which can effectively increase useful flux and force flux lines to pass through the entire machine during operation as opposed to two separate torque components as in a normal dual-stator permanent magnet machine. To clearly place the advantages of the proposed topology in perspective, the proposed dual-stator interior permanent magnet vernier machine is compared to a well-known dual-stator surface-mounted permanent magnet vernier machine. This article discusses the operation principle and magnetic field analysis of the proposed machine and reports comparison simulation results taken from the finite-element method. In addition, the stator tooth is optimized for further better performance on torque density and power factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available