4.6 Article

Prognostic factors and outcomes in Italian patients undergoing curative gastric cancer surgery

Journal

EJSO
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 345-351

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.11.002

Keywords

Gastric adenocarcinoma; Tumor-related factors; Overall survival; Disease-free survival; Lymph node metastasis ratio

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [IG 10491]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Survival of patients after curative surgical resection for gastric cancer (GC) remains poor, thus emphasizing the need for better definition of prognostic factors to improve the long-term course of disease. Methods: From 1999 to 2009, 110 patients had curative-intent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Clinicopathological features, Helicobacter pylori infection, dietary habits and lifestyle, and the presence of proinflammatory gene polymorphisms were evaluated. Results: At the end of follow-up, 55 deaths had occurred, 48 of them due to GC, whereas the median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 62 and 51 months, respectively. From the Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, statistically significant differences in OS and DFS were found for tumor site (only for DFS), tumor size, lymph node metastasis ratio (NR), and tumor-node-metastasis stage, but not for age, comorbidity, H. pylori infection, cigarette smoking, and IL1B or TNFA polymorphisms. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed NR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. Cardia tumor and patient age 65 years or older were also independent prognostic, factors for OS and DFS. Conclusions: Tumor-related factors remain strongest predictors of survival in GC patients after surgery. Particularly, NR was an effective feature in identifying patients at high risk for adverse outcome. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available