4.6 Article

The accuracy of digital infrared imaging for breast cancer detection in women undergoing breast biopsy

Journal

EJSO
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 535-540

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.04.003

Keywords

Breast cancer; Diagnostic imaging; Thermography; Digital infrared imaging

Funding

  1. Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Mammography has a lower sensitivity for breast cancer detection in younger women and those with dense breasts. Recent improvements in digital infrared breast imaging suggest there may be a role for this technology and we have studied its performance in 100 women prior to breast needle core biopsy (CB). Methods: All patients were imaged using a digital infrared breast (DIB) scan (Sentinel BreastScan(TM)) prior to breast biopsy. Analysis of the infrared scans was performed, blinded to biopsy results, ill four different ways: Sentinel screening report, Sentinel artificial intelligence (neural network), expert manual review and NoTouch BreastScan a novel artificial intelligence programme. Results: Of 106 biopsies performed in 100 women, 65 were malignant and 41 were benign. Sensitivity of Sentinel screening (53%) and Sentinel neural network (48%) was low but analysis with NoTouch software (70%) was much closer to expert manual review (78%). Sensitivity (78%) and specificity (75%) using NoTouch BreastScan were higher in women under 50 and the combination of mammography and DIB, with NoTouch interpretation, in this age group resulted in a sensitivity of 89%. Conclusion: DIB using NoTouch is an effective adjunctive test for breast cancer detection in women under 70 and appears to be particularly effective in women under 50 where maximal sensitivity (78%) and specificity (75%) were observed. The combined sensitivity of NoTouch BreastScan and mammography in women under 50 was encouraging at 89%, suggesting a potential way forward for a dual imaging approach in this younger age group. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available