4.3 Article

Difference Scores From the Point of View of Reliability and Repeated-Measures ANOVA: In Defense of Difference Scores for Data Analysis

Journal

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 37-43

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0013164411409929

Keywords

change scores; difference scores; reliability

Funding

  1. MITACS
  2. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is such doubt in research practice about the reliability of difference scores that granting agencies, journal editors, reviewers, and committees of graduate students' theses have been known to deplore their use. This most maligned index can be used in studies of change, growth, or perhaps discrepancy between two measures taken on the same sampling unit. The most commonly stated problem with difference scores is the supposed associated increase in unreliability of difference scores. In this article, the authors examine difference scores from the point of view of reliability and repeated-measures ANOVA. The authors demonstrate that when the focus of difference scores is data analysis of aggregate models, their use should not be assessed in terms of reliability, and that the complete abolition of difference scores in research practice is unwarranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available