4.7 Article

Selenium protects rice plants from water deficit stress

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 562-570

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.022

Keywords

Agronomic biofortiflcation; Sodium selenate; Food composition; Antioxidant enzymes; Abiotic stress

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil [309380/2017, 448783/2014-2]
  2. Coordination of Higher Education Personnel Improvement (CAPES), Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selenium (Se) is essential to humans and animals due to its antioxidant properties. Although it is not considered an essential nutrient for higher plants. Many studies show that Se in low concentrations (up to 0.5 mg kg(-1)) provides beneficial effects to non-hyperaccumulating plants by participating in antioxidant defense systems and enhancing tolerance to abiotic stress. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of Se application rates on rice plants under different soil water conditions. The experiment was conducted on an Oxisol using four Se rates (0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg kg(-1)) and two soil water conditions (irrigated and water deficit). Selenium application via soil up to 0.5 mg kg(-1) increased the plant height, chlorophyll index, sulfur and copper accumulation in shoots, carbon dioxide assimilation, superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1) activity and decreased the hydrogen peroxide concentration in rice leaves. The accumulation of Se in shoot biomass and Se concentration in seeds increased linearly with the applied rates. Water deficit strongly decreased the plant growth and yield. However, rice plants treated with Se showed higher net photosynthesis, water use efficiency and antioxidant system. This study provides useful information about the roles of Se in protecting rice plants from water deficit stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available