4.7 Article

Mercury, lead, and cadmium in blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, from the Atlantic coast of Florida, USA: A multipredator approach

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 196-201

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.029

Keywords

Contaminants; Heavy metals; Mercury; Lead; Cadmium; Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus)

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of the Interior
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  3. Federal Aid for Sportfish Restoration Project [F-43]
  4. State of Florida

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, from the Atlantic coast of Florida were analyzed for total mercury, methylmercury, lead, and cadmium. Paired samples of two tissue types were analyzed for each crab, (1) muscle tissue (cheliped and body muscles) and (2) whole-body tissue (all organs, muscle tissue and connective tissue), for evaluation of the concentration of metals available to human consumers as well as estuarine predators. There were clear patterns of tissue-specific partitioning for each metal. Total mercury was significantly greater in muscle tissue (mean= 0.078 mu g/g) than in whole-body tissue (mean=0.055 mu g/g). Conversely, whole-body concentrations of lead and cadmium (means =0.131 and 0.079 mu g/g, respectively) were significantly greater than concentrations in muscle (means =0.02 and 0.029 mu g/g, respectively). There were no significant correlations between any metal contaminant and crab size. Cadmium levels were significantly greater in the muscle tissue of females, but, no other sex-related differences were seen for other metals or tissue types. Methylmercury composed 93-100% of the total mercury in tissues. Compared to previous blue crab studies from different regions of the United States, mean concentrations of mercury, lead, and cadmium were relatively low, although isolated groups or individual blue crabs accumulated high metal concentrations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available