4.7 Article

Toxicity assessments with Daphnia magna of Guadipyr, a new neonicotinoid insecticide and studies of its effect on acetylcholinesterase (AChE), glutathione S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT) and chitobiase activities

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 339-344

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.09.013

Keywords

Guadipyr; Zooplankton; Acute toxicity; Chronic toxicity; Chitobiase activity

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest: Study on Comprehensive Cultivation Techniques for Pesticide Risk Assessment [200903054-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guadipyr is a novel neonicotinoid insecticide, developed by the China Agricultural University. This work investigated its aquatic toxicity on Daphnia magna. The acute immobilization test showed that guadipyr was slightly toxic to daphnids, with a 48 h EC50 of 13.01 mg/L. In addition, guadipyr significantly enhanced the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity (per gram of protein), but had no obvious impact on catalase (CAT) activity within 48 h. The 21 d chronic exposure of D. magna to guadipyr induced a significant decrease in body growth and reproduction; both share the same lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) at 0.10 mg/L. In the 14 d chronic test, a significant increase in chitobiase activity in test media was observed at day 8 (days to the first breeding), while a significant decrease was observed from days 10 to 14, which might be due to the endocrine imbalance resulting from guadipyr stress. These results demonstrated that guadipyr can induce notable negative ecotoxicological impacts on the aquatic system in long-term exposure at a sub-lethal dose. Further research in environmental behaviors is needed to regulate guadipyr use in the future. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available