4.7 Article

Dietary intake and potential health risk of DDTs and PBDEs via seafood consumption in South China

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 73, Issue 7, Pages 1812-1819

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.009

Keywords

Dietary intake; Risk assessment; Polybrominated diphenyl ethers; Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; Seafood; South China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40821003, U0633005, 40532013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A total of 602 seafood samples, including fish, shrimps, crabs and molluscs, were analyzed for a suite of persistent halogenated compounds. The residual levels of DDTs (sum of o,p' - and p,p'-DDT, DDD, and DDE) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) varied significantly among different species, and ranged from non-detectable (nd) to 699 ng/g and nd to 5.93 ng/g, respectively. Comparison of the levels of DDTs and PBDEs in mussel samples worldwide suggested that South China is probably one of the most DDT-polluted areas, but is moderate at most in terms of PBDE contamination. Combined with a recent dietary survey at the same sampling locations, dietary intakes of DDTs and PBDEs by local residents via seafood consumption for all age groups were estimated to be 147-564 and 4.7-18.5 ng/day, or 8.5-12.9 and 0.27-0.46 ng/kg bw/day, respectively. Among the different seafood types, fish contributed the largest portion of the dietary intakes of DDTs (57%), followed by molluscs (38%). Similarly, the dietary intakes of PBDEs were also dominated by fish (45%) and molluscs (45%). Assessment based on several available guidelines suggested that though no significant human health risk associated with the dietary intake of PBDEs, a lifetime cancer risk from dietary exposure to DDTs remains a probability. Because dietary intake of DDTs was dominated by fish and molluscs, added concern should be paid to fish and molluscs. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available