4.5 Article

Single and combined effects of selected pharmaceuticals at sublethal concentrations on multiple biomarkers in Carassius auratus

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 353-361

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0796-9

Keywords

Caffeine; Sulfamethoxazole; Biomarker; Carassius auratus

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51079049]
  2. Qing Lan Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the sublethal effects of caffeine, sulfamethoxazole and their mixture on goldfish (Carassius auratus) were investigated, the biomarkers including acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in brain, 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase (EROD), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in liver and vitellogenin (VTG) in serum were determined after 1, 2, 4, and 7 days of exposure. AChE activity was significantly inhibited by caffeine (a parts per thousand yen0.4 mg/l), sulfamethoxazole (a parts per thousand yen0.4 mg/l) and their mixtures (a parts per thousand yen0.048 mg/l) during all exposure periods, and obvious concentration-response and time-response relationships were obtained. EROD, GST and SOD activities were significantly increased by individual compounds and mixtures in most cases. GST induction exhibited bell-shaped concentration-response curves. Serum VTG was significantly induced by 2 mg/l of caffeine, 10 mg/l of sulfamethoxazole and the mixtures at concentrations a parts per thousand yen1.2 mg/l. In general, the two pharmaceuticals induced similar biological responses. The joint effect of caffeine/sulfamethoxazole was additive with regard to AChE and GST activity variation and was antagonistic with regard to EROD and SOD induction. The results indicated that multiple biomarker response method might be a useful tool for describing an integrated toxicological effect of chemicals. VTG induction suggested that caffeine and sulfamethoxazole may cause a slightly feminization effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available