4.5 Article

Evidence for the Role of Subterranean Termites (Reticulitermes spp.) in Temperate Forest Soil Nutrient Cycling

Journal

ECOSYSTEMS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 602-618

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-018-0291-8

Keywords

bioengineer; carbon; feces; elemental analysis; nitrogen; trace nutrients; southeastern US; trace minerals; trace metals; wood degradation

Categories

Funding

  1. Georgia Department of Agriculture
  2. USDA Forest Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Termites are ecosystem engineers in tropical systems, constructing visible biogenic structures (mounds) that influence soil characteristics, decomposition, nutrient cycling, vegetative growth, and biodiversity. Subterranean termites (Reticulitermes spp.) likely influence nutrient cycling within their endemic range in the temperate Holarctic through the translocation of elements from wood to soil by lining their below-ground biogenic structures with frass (feces). We designed a study to follow the frass' by comparing concentrations of 18 elements (Al, B, Ba, C, Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, N, Na, P, Si, Sr, and Zn) in substratesfood before and after digestion (wood and frass), as well as soil with and without direct termite manipulation (shelter tubes and soil core samples)associated with 18 subterranean termite colonies. Fourteen elements were more concentrated in frass than wood, and only Cr and Fe were lower in frass. The shelter tube-to-soil contrasts indicate that termites decrease levels of Al, Ba, Co, and Cr while increasing C and Ca in soil. Therefore, Reticulitermes likely modulate element flows by returning organic C and base cations to weathered, acidic Ultisols of southeastern US forests. Research on the ecological role of subterranean termites outside of the built environment is showing the scale of impact these cryptic superorganism ecosystem engineers can have on temperate forest functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available